Ban the Box

Ban the Box is the name of an international campaign by civil rights groups and advocates for ex-offenders, aimed at persuading employers to remove from their hiring applications the check box that asks if applicants have a criminal record. Its purpose is to enable ex-offenders to display their qualifications in the hiring process before being asked about their criminal records. The premise of the campaign is that anything that makes it harder for ex-offenders to find a job makes it likelier that they will re-offend, which is bad for society.

History

The campaign began in Hawaii in the late 1990s, and has gained strength in other U.S. states following the 2007–2009 recession. Its advocates say it is necessary because a growing number of Americans have criminal records due to tougher sentencing laws particularly for drug crimes,[1] and are having difficulty finding work because of high unemployment and a rise in background checks that followed the September 11 terror attacks on the United States.[2]

As of July 2015, 52 U.S. municipalities and 18 states had in place legislation that "banned the box" for government job applications and also in some cases those of their private contractors.[3] Many such ordinances exempt applications for "sensitive" positions, such as those involving work with children.[1] Target Corporation "banned the box" in October 2013.[4]

In the United Kingdom, corporate social responsibility advocacy charity Business in the Community launched a "ban the box" campaign in October 2013.[5]

The campaign has been criticized by U.S. industry group the National Retail Federation for exposing companies, their customers and employees to potential crime,[1] and by the New Jersey Chamber of Commerce, which says it could expose employers to lawsuits from unsuccessful applicants.[2]

In June 2016, a large experimental study was published by Princeton University economist Amanda Agan and University of Michigan Law School professor Sonja Starr on the racial gap in callback rates of employers to job applicants of different racial backgrounds in New Jersey and New York City before and after Ban the Box laws went into effect. Agan and Starr sent out 15,000 fictitious online job applications to companies in those areas with racially stereotypical names on the job applications. Prior to the implementation of Ban the Box laws in New Jersey and New York City, the gap in the callback rate between the job applications with stereo-typically black names and stereo-typically white names was 7 percent. After the implementation of Ban the Box laws, the racial gap in the callback rate increased to 45 percent.[6][7][8][9][10] A July 2016 study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research on Ban the Box laws by University of Virginia professor Jennifer L. Doleac and University of Oregon economist Benjamin Hansen found that in jurisdictions where Ban the Box laws have been implemented, the probabilities of young, non-college educated, black and Hispanic males being employed have declined.[11][12][13][14][15][16] An October 2006 study with a similar finding published in The Journal of Law and Economics by McCourt School of Public Policy economist Harry J. Holzer, University of California, Berkeley public policy professor Steven Raphael, and University of California, Los Angeles public affairs professor Michael A. Stoll found that employers who made routine criminal background checks for all job applicants, regardless of their racial backgrounds, hired black applicants (especially black males) at a higher rate than those employers that did not make routine criminal background checks for all applicants.[17][18]

Fair Chance

In 2014, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed the Fair Chance Ordinance, authored by Supervisors Jane Kim and Malia Cohen.[19] October 27, 2015, NYC enacted the Fair Chance Law.[20]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Harless, William (3 August 2013). "'Ban the Box' Laws Make Criminal Pasts Off-Limits". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 30 October 2013.
  2. 1 2 Marois, Michael B. (11 October 2013). "California Gives Break to Growing Workforce With Criminal Past". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 30 October 2013.
  3. ↑ "Even the smallest record can be a life sentence of poverty". NewsOK.com. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
  4. ↑ Staples, Brent (29 October 2013). "Target Bans the Box". New York Times. Retrieved 30 October 2013.
  5. ↑ Howard, Stephen (17 October 2013). "'Ban the Box' campaign asks employers to give ex-offenders a chance". the Guardian. Retrieved 30 October 2013.
  6. ↑ Agan, Amanda Y.; Starr, Sonja B. (June 14, 2016). "Ban the Box, Criminal Records, and Statistical Discrimination: A Field Experiment". University of Michigan Law & Economics Working Papers. 16-012.
  7. ↑ Vedantam, Shankar (July 19, 2016). "'Ban The Box' Laws,' Do They Help Job Applicants With Criminal Histories?" (Interview). Interview with Steve Inskeep. NPR. Retrieved August 8, 2016.
  8. ↑ "'Ban the Box' leads to increase in employer racial discrimination". Michigan News. University of Michigan. June 15, 2016. Retrieved August 8, 2016.
  9. ↑ Semuels, Alana (August 4, 2016). "The Unforeseen Consequences of Banning the Box". The Atlantic. Atlantic Media. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  10. ↑ Massey, Wyatt (July 30, 2016). "Ban the Box increases racial discrimination, study says". The Baltimore Sun. tronc. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  11. ↑ Doleac, Jennifer L.; Hansen, Benjamin (July 2016). Does "Ban the Box" Help or Hurt Low-Skilled Workers? Statistical Discrimination and Employment Outcomes When Criminal Histories are Hidden (Report). NBER Working Papers. 22469. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. ↑ Doleac, Jennifer L.; Hansen, Benjamin. "Does "ban the box" help or hurt low-skilled workers? Statistical discrimination and employment outcomes when criminal histories are hidden" (PDF).
  13. ↑ Semuels, Alana (August 4, 2016). "The Unforeseen Consequences of Banning the Box". The Atlantic. Atlantic Media. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  14. ↑ "How 'ban the box' backfires for minority job-seekers". Phys.org. August 8, 2016. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  15. ↑ "UVA Researchers: Ban the Box Policy Leading to More Discrimination". WVIR-TV. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  16. ↑ Cappelli, Peter (August 8, 2016). "Is 'Ban the Box' a Pandora's Box?". Human Resource Executive Online. Retrieved August 10, 2016.
  17. ↑ Holzer, Harry J.; Raphael, Steven; Stoll, Michael A. (October 2006). "Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks, and the Racial Hiring Practices of Employers". The Journal of Law and Economics. University of Chicago Press. 49 (2): 451–480. doi:10.1086/501089. JSTOR 10.1086/501089 – via JSTOR. (registration required (help)).
  18. ↑ Sowell, Thomas (2011), Economic Facts and Fallacies (2nd ed.), New York: Basic Books, p. 191, A study of those employers who routinely check for prison records among all people who apply for employment found that these particular employers hired black males more often than other employers did.
  19. ↑ Lagos, Marisa (February 4, 2014). "San Francisco supervisors pass "ban the box" law". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 26 February 2014.
  20. ↑ "Fair Chance NYC". Fair Chance NYC. Retrieved 2015-11-05.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/10/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.