California Proposition 74 (2005)

Proposition 74 (2005) was a ballot proposition in the 2005 California special election that intended to extend probationary periods for the state's public school teachers from two years to five before attaining tenure. It failed at the polls, with 55% of voters rejecting it.

Background

New Jersey actually became the first state to pass tenure legislation when, in 1910, it granted fair-dismissal rights to college professors.[1] The Incumbent law, passed in 1983, required that teachers be evaluated for performance during a two-year probationary period before gaining tenure.[2] In the winter of 2004, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger sponsored a bill to amend the state Constitution to require merit pay for teachers. The state legislature voted against the bill in February 2005.[3] The next month, Governor Schwarzenegger formally endorsed the Put Kids First Act, written and submitted by Assemblymember Bonnie Garcia (Republican, Cathedral City). That act laid out the conditions for Proposition 74, including increasing probationary period from two to five years and allowing school districts to dismiss teachers who receive two consecutive negative job evaluations. It qualified for the ballot June 6.[4]

Summary (From the State Attorney General)

Proposition 74: Public School Teachers. Waiting Period for Permanent Status. Dismissal. Initiative Statute.

Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments:

Campaign

Support

Governor Schwarzenegger, along with former United States Secretary of State and economic advisor to the governor George Shultz and Fresno County Superintendent of Schools Pete Mehas, supported Proposition 74.[3] Prop 74 was one of four propositions (the other three were 73, 75, and 76) the governor touted as his reform package.

One major point the proponents constantly cited was a horror story: A Riverside teacher swore at her students, showed them R-rated movies, and generally was a bad teacher; however, due to tenure rules, the district had to pay the teacher $25,000 USD to quit. They said that Proposition 74 would make it easier to fire these kinds of teachers because they had a longer tenure period and less paperwork and procedures to fire a teacher.[5]

Opposition

California's two teachers unions, the California Teachers Association and California Federation of Teachers, as well as state superintendent of education Jack O'Connell, opposed the measure.[3] Arguments that the unions presented against Proposition 74 included that its new requirements would discourage new teachers and encourage school districts to lay off older teachers for costing more in salary and benefits, all while doing little to nothing to improve classrooms.[2]

Result

On November 8, 2005, California voters soundly rejected the proposition, with 44.8% voting for and 55.2% voting against.

References

  1. ↑ Stephy (2008-11-17). "Tenure". Time Magazine Writer. Time Magazine. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
  2. 1 2 Janofsky, Michael (2005-10-20). "In California, a Fierce Battle Is Joined Over Teachers". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  3. 1 2 3 Asimov, Nanette (2005-09-30). "Teacher job security fuels Prop. 74 battle". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  4. ↑ "Proposition 74: Teacher Tenure". University of California, Berkeley - Institute of Governmental Studies. 2005. Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-27.
  5. ↑ "Arguments and Rebuttals - Proposition 74". Official Voter Information Guide. California Secretary of State. 2005. Retrieved 2009-06-26.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.