ChIP-exo

ChIP-exo workflow

ChIP-exo is a chromatin immunoprecipitation based method for mapping the locations at which a protein of interest (transcription factor) binds to the genome. It is a modification of the ChIP-seq protocol, improving the resolution of binding sites from hundreds of base pairs to almost one base pair. It employs the use of exonucleases to degrade strands of the protein-bound DNA in the 5'-3' direction to within a small number of nucleotides of the protein binding site. The nucleotides of the exonuclease-treated ends are determined using some combination of DNA sequencing, microarrays, and PCR. These sequences are then mapped to the genome to identify the locations on the genome at which the protein binds.

Theory

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) techniques have been in use since 1984[1] to detect protein-DNA interactions. There have been many variations on ChIP to improve the quality of results. One such improvement, ChIP-on-chip (ChIP-chip), combines ChIP with microarray technology. This technique has limited sensitivity and specificity, especially in vivo where microarrays are constrained by thousands of proteins present in the nuclear compartment, resulting in a high rate of false positives.[2] Next came ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq), which combines ChIP with high-throughput sequencing.[3] However, the heterogeneous nature of sheared DNA fragments maps binding sites to within ±300 base pairs, limiting specificity. Secondly, contaminating DNA presents a grave problem since so few genetic loci are cross-linked to the protein of interest, making any non-specific genomic DNA a significant source of background noise.[4]

To address these problems, Rhee and Pugh revised the classic nuclease protection assay to develop ChIP-exo.[5] This new ChIP technique relies on a lambda exonuclease that degrades only, and all, unbound double-stranded DNA in the 5′-3′ direction. Briefly, a protein of interest (engineering one with an epitope tag can be useful for immunoprecipitation) is crosslinked in vivo to its natural binding locations across a genome using formaldehyde. Cells are then collected, broken open, and the chromatin sheared and solubilized by sonication. An antibody is then used to immunoprecipitate the protein of interest, along with the crosslinked DNA. DNA PCR adaptors are then ligated to the ends, which serve as a priming point for second strand DNA synthesis after the exonuclease digestion. Lambda exonuclease then digests double DNA strands from the 5′ end until digestion is blocked at the border of the protein-DNA covalent interaction. Most contaminating DNA is degraded by the addition of a second single-strand specific exonuclease. After the cross-linking is reversed, the primers to the PCR adaptors are extended to form double stranded DNA, and a second adaptor is ligated to 5′ ends to demarcate the precise location of exonuclease digestion cessation. The library is then amplified by PCR, and the products are identified by high throughput sequencing. This method allows for resolution of up to a single base pair for any protein binding site within any genome, which is a much higher resolution than either ChIP-chip or ChIP-seq.

Work Flow

This step-wise work flow is a summary of the methods reported by the ChIP-exo developers:[5]

  1. Incubate cells expressing your protein of interest with formaldehyde, quench with glycine to cross-link proteins to DNA.
  2. Disrupt cells by vortexing with glass beads.
  3. Harvest nuclear pellet by centrifugation.
  4. Sonicate nuclear pellet to shear DNA.
  5. Dilute solubilized chromatin with lysis buffer and incubate with antibody-bound sepharose resin, specific for the protein of interest.
  6. Wash immunoprecipitates with a high salt wash buffer, followed by two increasingly stringent wash buffers.
  7. While still on the resin, polish fragment ends with T4 DNA polymerase and dNTPs. An optional kinase may also be used.
  8. Ligate first PCR adaptors to each end of the fragments with T4 DNA ligase.
  9. Ligation with unphosphorylated adaptors leaves a nick (one of the strands not ligated), which is then repaired using phi29 polymerase and dNTPs.
  10. Treat with lambda exonuclease to digest unbound DNA and a second single-strand specific exonuclease (Recj)to eliminate background DNA.
  11. Elute immunoprecipitate from resin with elution buffer.
  12. Reverse cross-links by heating to >65 °C.
  13. Extract DNA using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and precipitate DNA using ethanol.
  14. Denature DNA to make single strands at 95 °C.
  15. Anneal and extend primers for the PCR adaptors from step 8 with phi29 polymerase.
  16. Ligate a second PCR adaptor to the 5′ exonuclease-digested ends with T4 DNA ligase.
  17. Purify samples with magnetic beads.
  18. Amplify DNA using LM-PCR.
  19. Purify products 120-160 base pairs in length by gel electrophoresis.
  20. Deep-sequence the PCR products with your platform of choice. The type of sequencing platform will depend on your choice of adaptors.

Advantages

Limitations

Applications

See also

References

  1. Gilmour, DS; JT Lis (1983). "Detecting protein-DNA interactions in vivo: Distribution of RNA polymerase on specific bacterial genes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 81: 4275–4279. doi:10.1073/pnas.81.14.4275.
  2. Albert, I; TN Mavrich; LP Tomsho; J Qi; SJ Zanton; SC Schuster; BF Pugh (2007). "Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucelosomes cross the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome". Nature. 446 (7135): 572–576. doi:10.1038/nature05632. PMID 17392789.
  3. Ren, B; F Robert; JJ Wyrick; O Aparicio; EG Jennings; I Simon; J Zeitlinger; J Schreiber; N Hannett; E Kan; et al. (2000). "Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins". Science. 290 (5500): 2306–2309. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2306. PMID 11125145.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Pugh, Benjamin. "Methods, Systems and Kits for Detecting Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions". United States Application Publication. United States Patents. Retrieved 17 February 2012.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Rhee, Ho Sung; BJ Pugh (2011). "Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution". Cell. 147: 1408–1419. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.013.
  6. Rhee, Ho Sung; BJ Pugh (2012). "Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes". Nature. 483: 295–301. doi:10.1038/nature10799.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/16/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.