Controversies surrounding G4S

This article concerns the British G4S plc. and its Israeli subsidiary. For its American subsidiary (formerly Wackenhut), see G4S Secure Solutions

G4S describes itself as "the world's leading provider of security solutions"[1] and provides security services for over 40 embassies around the world, work as stewards at football stadiums and runs over six British prisons, operates prisoner tagging schemes, assists within the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in the United Kingdom, and provides administrative roles to the health and education sectors.[2]

G4S' controversies became known to the wider public following their handling of security for the 2012 Summer Olympics, but has been controversial since the 1990s, when it operated under the name Group 4. However, the corporation insists that the level of substantiated complaints was extremely low and they are of a minor nature.[2]

Detention centres

The company received over 700 complaints from illegal immigrants held in G4S detention centres in 2010, including allegations of assault and racism.[2] Three accounts of assault and two accounts of racial discrimination were upheld in relation to the company, although the majority of complaints against the company related to loss of property and lack of communication.[3] Following release of an extremely critical report regarding a G4S-operated jail, the Labor party's shadow justice secretary said they would be inclined to take control of for-profit prisons if the industry competitors had not met deadlines imposed upon them. Sadiq Khan's response stressed the need for better contracting, to include liquidated damages provisions. The chief inspector of prisons Nick Hardwick, recommended the crafting of a takeover contingency plan. "It's not delivering what the public should expect of the millions being paid to G4S to run it." Khan said, " I see no difference whether the underperformance is in the public, private or voluntary sector... We shouldn't tolerate mediocrity in the running of our prisons." Khan continued: "We can't go on with scandal after scandal, where the public's money is being squandered and the quality of what's delivered isn't up to scratch. The government is too reliant on a cosy group of big companies. The public are rightly getting fed up to the back teeth of big companies making huge profits out of the taxpayer, which smacks to them of rewards for failure." [4]

Inappropriate monitoring of prosthetic limbs

In August 2011, G4S staff attached an electronic monitoring tag to the false leg of a one-legged criminal, meaning he was able to go out and leave it at home. G4S sacked the two members of staff responsible.[2]

Two members of staff were sacked from the company after a 29-year-old wrapped his prosthetic limb in a bandage and fooled them into tagging it. He could then simply remove his prosthetic leg with the tag attached to it whenever he wanted to breach his court-imposed curfew for driving and drug offences, as well as possession of an offensive weapon. The staff were ruled to have failed to carry out the proper tests when they set up the tag and monitoring equipment at his Rochdale home.[3]

Olympic security preparations

G4S' conduct during the London 2012 Olympic Games was described as "totally chaotic" and "an utter farce" by former police officers, especially their recruitment campaign. Key issues cited were a lack of organisation, with many guards unaware of where they were supposed to be for the Olympic Games.[5]

G4S received a £284m contract to provide 13,700 guards for the Olympic Games, but amid concerns that there were staff shortages, the West Midlands Police Federation reported that its officers were being prepared to guard the Ricoh Arena in Coventry.[5] Upon the deployment of 3,500 extra armed troops to guard Olympic venues, Theresa May denied that the organisation of the games amounted to a "shambles".[6]

Israel and Palestine

G4S supplied security equipment, services and maintenance for use at Israeli prisons, checkpoints and settlements in the West Bank, including across the highly controversial Israeli West Bank barrier.[7][8] In 2007, the Israeli subsidiary of G4S signed a contract with the Israeli Prison Authority to provide security systems for major Israeli prisons. In April 2012, G4S released a statement detailing its activities in Israel – the provision of maintenance for some electronic security systems at a prison, a police station and a small number of checkpoints in the West Bank.[9] In June 2014, Desmond Tutu and others protested at G4S's involvement with Israeli prisons.[10] They also penned an open letter to the security firm, calling for it to "end its complicity in Israel's abuse of child prisoners".[11] A report prepared by Hugo Slim, a research fellow at University of Oxford, and commissioned by G4S stated that the company "had no causal or contributory role in human rights violations" and "there are clearly human rights failings in some parts of Israel's security system, but G4S's role is far removed from their immediate causes and impact."[12]

In 2015 G4S was targeted by the BDS movement in a campaign asking the United Nations to drop its contracts with the firm,[13] and a number of trade unions have joined the boycott. In March 2016, the company revoked its contract with Israel, with G4S chief executive Ashley Almanza saying that the company expected to exit a number of businesses "in the next 12 to 24 months ... including G4S Israel".[14] This was claimed by the national committee of the Palestine-based BDS group as a result of an international campaign against Israel, with Mahmoud Nawajaa (a representative of the group) saying:

As the height of the international boycott of apartheid South Africa, BDS pressure is making some of the world’s largest corporations realise that profiting from Israeli apartheid and colonialism is bad for business. Investment fund managers are increasingly recognising that their fiduciary responsibility obliges them to divest from Israeli banks and companies that are implicated in Israel's serious human rights violations, such as G4S and HP, because of the high risk entailed. We are starting to notice a domino effect.[14]

Wackenhut subsidiary

Main article: G4S Secure Solutions

G4S subsidiary Wackenhut, in September 2005, faced allegations of security lapses at seven military bases where it was contracted to provide services. The company claimed the accusations were false and promoted by a union seeking to enroll its employees.[15]

In March 2006, whistle-blowers employed at Wackenhut released information to the press revealing that the company cheated on an anti-terrorism drill at a US nuclear site. It also performed poorly on another drill at a separate location. The allegations claimed that Wackenhut systematically violated weapons inventory and handling policies and that managers showed new hires spots at the facilities where they could take naps and cut corners during patrols.[16]

In July 2007, US Senator Bob Casey urged Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne to re-examine federal plans involving Wackenhut and its operations at US nuclear facilities, public transit systems and the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. The Senator said the company was responsible for short-changing its employees.[17]

In winter 2008, the New York Times reported that the Exelon Corporation would replace Wackenhut as an in-house security provider at ten US nuclear power plants. This followed the discovery of guards sleeping while on the clock.[18]

On 24 January 2012, the Knoxville News Sentinel reported that a Wackenhut security guard slept while on the job at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and had also used an unauthorised mobile telephone while inside the high-security facility. Photographs of the incidents were distributed to the publication, as well as the lab, Wackenhut and the US Department of Energy, which oversees the plant's operations. The facility houses approximately half a ton of Uranium 233, enough for nearly 250 improvised nuclear detonations.[19] On 28 July 2012 the US Department of Energy's Y-12 National Security Complex, protected by a US subsidiary of G4S, was breached by three protesters, identified as Megan Rice, 82, Michael Walli, 63 and Greg Boertje-Obed, 57, who got as far as the outer wall of the uranium building and allegedly daubed it with slogans and splashed it with human blood.[20] The three form the anti-nuclear weapons activist group Transform Now Plowshares, a part of the Plowshares Movement.[20] Operations at the site were suspended following the breach[21] after performance tests were conducted on the Wackenhut Services Inc. Oak Ridge guard force. During the tests, a federal inspector discovered copies of questions and answers for the test inside a guard force vehicle, resulting in the administrative reassignment of the new security director.[22]

In 2012, the Kansas City Star reported that three protestors were found in a secure area at the Y-12 National Security Complex.[23]

In 2013, G4S announced its intention to divest its US Government services business, citing difficulties faced by non US business in accessing appropriate data.[24]

Unlawful killing of Jimmy Mubenga

In October 2010, three G4S-guards restrained and held down 46-year-old Angolan deportee Jimmy Mubenga on departing British Airways flight 77, at Heathrow Airport. Security guards kept him restrained in his seat as he began shouting and seeking to resist his deportation. Police and paramedics were called when Mubenga lost consciousness. The aircraft, which had been due to lift off, then returned to the terminal.[25] Mubenga was pronounced dead later that evening at Hillingdon hospital.[26] Passengers reported hearing cries of "don't do this" and "they are trying to kill me." Scotland Yard's homicide unit began an investigation after the death became categorised as "unexplained". Three private security guards, contracted to escort deportees for the Home Office, were released on bail, after having been interviewed about the incident.[25]

In February 2011, The Guardian reported that G4S guards in the United Kingdom had been repeatedly warned about the use of potentially lethal force on detainees and asylum seekers. Confidential informants and several employees released the information to reporters after G4S's practices allegedly led to the death of Jimmy Mubenga. An internal document urged management to "meet this problem head on before the worst happens" and that G4S was "playing Russian roulette with detainees' lives."[27] The following autumn, the company once again faced allegations of abuse. G4S guards were accused of verbally harassing and intimidating detainees with offensive and racist language.[28]

In July 2012, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced its conclusion that there was "insufficient evidence to bring any charges for Mr Mubenga's death" against G4S or any of its former employees.[29] On 9 July 2013 an inquest jury, in a nine-to-one decision, found that Mubenga's death was caused by the G4S guards "using unreasonable force and acting in an unlawful manner." The CPS subsequently announced that it was reconsidering its decision not to bring criminal charges[30] and in November 2014 the trial of three G4S guards on charges of manslaughter began. Colin Kaler, 51, from Bedfordshire, Terrence Hughes, 53, from Hampshire, and Stuart Tribelnig, 38, from Surrey all denied the charges against them.

In an unprecedented move, part of the seating within a Boeing 777 aircraft was constructed inside the Old Bailey courtroom to demonstrate to the jury the circumstances in which the death occurred.[31] On 17 November 2014, the jurors were offered the chance to recreate the conditions experienced by Mubenga during his time on board the aeroplane. Six participated, taking turns to be restrained in exactly the same seat position that Mubenga had occupied and wearing the same type of handcuffs. In addition, a small number of the jurors took turns to view the scene by kneeling in a seat in the row immediately in front and leaning over to watch. This posture had been adopted by one of the three guards. The public gallery and dock were cleared while the jury took part in these recreations of the scene.[32]

On 16 December 2014, after a six-week trial, the jury found the defendants not guilty. After the verdict was declared, Mr Mubenga's wife Adrienne said:

"I am shocked and disappointed. It is hard for me to understand how the jury reached this decision with all this evidence that Jimmy said over and over that he could not breathe. I wish to thank everyone who have worked so hard for justice for me and our children. My struggle continues".[33]

On 17 December, the website openDemocracy gave a list of 65 "extreme racist" texts found on the mobile phones of the defendants. The jury had not been told about the texts as defence layers argued that the jurors response' would be unpredictable. Nor were they told of the coroners concerns about the possibility of racist treatment by G4S employees and the 'unlawful killing' verdict -sufficient omissions to destroy a criminal case against them according to a barrister quoted by the website.[34]
A spokesman for the UK’s Home Office said: “Our policy has always been that restraint during removals should only be used as a last resort. Our new bespoke training package for aircraft removals, approved in June this year, will better equip our staff with practical tools to minimise the need for restraint and ensure that only the most appropriate techniques are used”.[33]
The circumstances surrounding Mubenga's death led 41 campaign groups to call for an enquiry into G4S's suitability to run an Equality helpline.[35]

Unacceptable use of force by UK Border Agency

In October 2012 the Chief Inspector of Prisons, Nick Hardwick published his inspection report into the G4S managed Cedars Pre-Departure Accommodation UK Border Agency (UKBA).[36] Whilst the majority of the report praised G4S and those working at the centre, noting that "Cedars is an exceptional facility and has many practices which should be replicated in other areas of detention", G4S were criticised for using "non-approved techniques" during one particular incident in which a pregnant woman's wheelchair was tipped up whilst her feet were held.[37] The incident used "non-approved techniques" causing significant risk to the baby and was a "simply not acceptable" use of force.[37] In response, G4S said its staff were trying to prevent injury and that the report also praised the staff for an "exceptional level of care."[37]

Human rights allegations

Peter McCormack, 79, was chained to a prison custody officer employed by G4S for eight days while in Royal Liverpool University Hospital after a heart attack in March 2012. The restraint was removed only briefly for him to take off his upper clothing, and when he was under heavy sedation undergoing a heart procedure. Judge Graham Wood QC ruled in September 2014 that “During this time he was humiliated and his dignity was affronted.” McCormack was awarded £6,000 compensation for breach of his human rights. The judge criticised the evidence given by G4S’s then head of security, saying it was “less than impressive… It is a reasonable conclusion that she simply ignored a recommendation from a security manager”.[38]

Fraud allegations

In July 2013, British Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling, asked the Serious Fraud Office to investigate G4S for overcharging for tagging criminals in England and Wales, claiming that it and rival company Serco charged the government for tagging people who were not actually being monitored, including tags for people in prison or out of the country, and a small number who had died, and had done so since 2005. G4S was given an opportunity to take part in a "forensic audit" but initially refused.[39]

Following the completion of a review by the Cabinet Office into major contracts across government, Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office announced in December 2013, that their review had "found no evidence of deliberate acts or omissions by either firm leading to errors or irregularities in the charging and billing arrangements on the 28 contracts investigated.” [40]

In March 2014, G4S agreed to pay a settlement of £109 million to the government, incorporating a refund for disputed services and reimbursement of additional costs.[41]

South Africa prison accusations

In October 2013, the BBC reported that there are allegations of prisoners being tortured at Mangaung Prison in South Africa.[42] The BBC cites research from the Wits Justice Project at Wits University in Johannesburg, claiming that dozens of the nearly 3,000 inmates at the G4S prison have been tortured using electroshock and forced injections. As of October 2013, G4S said it was investigating the allegations.[42]

Immigrant-detainee labour

In August 2014, G4S was criticised for using immigrant detainees as cheap labour, with some being paid as little as £1 per hour. The Home Office defended the practice saying "The long-standing practice of offering paid work to detainees has been praised by Her Majesty's inspectorate of prisons as it helps to keep them occupied whilst their removal is being arranged. Whether or not they wish to participate is entirely up to the detainees themselves. This practice is not intended to substitute the work of trained staff".[43]

Child custodial institutions

Six members of staff were dismissed from G4S-operated Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre for children in Rugby in May 2015 following a series of incidents of gross misconduct. G4S took the action in response to an Ofsted inspection that reported some staff being on drugs while on duty, colluding with detainees and behaving "extremely inappropriately". The behaviour allegedly included causing distress and humiliation to children by subjecting them to degrading treatment and racist comments.[44][45]

Four G4S team leaders of Medway Secure Training Centre in Rochester were arrested in January 2016 and four other staff members were placed on restricted duties, following a BBC Panorama investigation into the centre. Allegations in the television programme included foul language and use of unnecessary force – such physical violence, overuse of restraint techniques (causing one teenager to have difficulties breathing) – on 10 boys aged 14 to 17, as well as a cover-up involving members of staff by avoiding surveillance cameras in order not to be recorded, and purposefully misreporting incidents in order to avoid potential fines and punishment; for example, in one exchange, it was claimed some staff don't report "two or more trainees fighting" because it indicates they've "lost control of the centre", resulting in a potential fine.[46][47][48]

G4S-run Medway managers received performance-related pay awards in April 2016, despite the chief inspector of prisons weeks saying weeks earlier that “managerial oversight failed to protect young people from harm at the jail.” In January, the BBC’s Panorama programme showed an undercover reporter working as a guard at the Medway secure training centre (STC) in Kent. The film showed children allegedly being mistreated and claimed that staff falsified records of violent incidents. No senior managers were disciplined or dismissed. Prior to the Panorama programme's broadcast, the Youth Justice Board (YJB), which oversees youth custody in England, stopped placing children in Medway. In February, a Guardian investigation revealed that, in 2003, whistleblowers had warned G4S, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the YJB that staff were mistreating detained children. Their letter, forwarded by Prof John Pitts, a youth justice expert, was ignored. When the prisons inspectorate carried out a snap inspection at Medway it found detainees reported staff had used insulting, aggressive or racist language toward them and felt unsafe in facility portions not covered by closed circuit TV. Reviewers agreed to the legitimacy of evidence presented by Panorama showing, "...targeted bullying of vulnerable boys,” by employees, and that, “A larger group of staff must have been aware of unacceptable practice but did not challenge or report this behaviour.”

In an earlier Ofsted report on Medway, inspectors said staff and middle managers reported feeling a lack of leadership and having “low, or no confidence in senior managers.” Nick Hardwick, at the time the chief inspector of prisons said, “Managerial oversight failed to protect young people from harm. Effective oversight is key to creating a positive culture that prevents poor practice happening and ensuring it is reported when it does.” The Guardian newspaper learned that senior managers at Medway received performance-related pay awards in April amounting to between 10-25% of their annual salaries, according to seniority. One 15-year-old girl placed at Medway in 2009 said she was frequently unlawfully restrained over 18 months, citing an occasion in which her face was repeatedly slammed into icy ground. “I assumed the senior management team would be sacked... But now it looks like they have been rewarded for allowing children to be abused in prison,” she said. Former Labour MP Sally Keeble has complained about G4S maltreatment in STC's for over ten years, stating: “This is people making personal profit out of tragedy. I hope that justice minister Liz Truss would intervene and make sure these bonuses are not being paid by a Ministry of Justice contractor.” Notwithstanding the results of the investigations no senior managers at Medway were disciplined or dismissed.[49] In May, the MoJ said the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) would take over the running of Medway. In July, it formally assumed control of the STC.

In February 2016, G4S had announced that it was to sell its children's services business, including the contract to manage two secure training centres. The company hoped to complete the process by the end of 2016.[50]

Police telephone data manipulation

In May 2016, the Independent Police Complaints Commission conducted an investigation into the practises of G4S working with Lincolnshire Police after five 999 control room staff for the police force were suspended amid claims workers made emergency calls at "quiet times" in a bid to improve call answering data. Disciplinary procedures were undertaken against the accused in accordance with company policy, and police said the staff involved are all former Lincolnshire Police employees who transferred to G4S four years ago and would be investigated by the police.[51] However, the Crown Prosecution Service has advised that no criminal conduct has so far been revealed by the investigation.[52]

Data for the control room seen by The Guardian show that without the extra test calls the control room would have missed its target of answering 92% of calls within 10 seconds in November and December. Only 89% of the genuine calls were answered within the target of 10 seconds but the inclusion of the test calls pushed answering performance 1% above target.[52]

G4S took over the running of services for the force as part of a £200m deal in 2012, the largest such contract in the United Kingdom.[52] The company aims to answer 92% of all 999 calls within 10 seconds and prior to the surfacing of these allegations, G4S previously said it had exceeded its targets for answering emergency calls.[51]

Employee Omar Mateen, U.S. mass murderer

On 12 June 2016, G4S employee Omar Mateen (via the US subsidiary G4S Secure Solutions), was identified as the perpetrator of the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting,[53] the deadliest mass-shooting in US history.[54] Before being killed by police, Mateen had shot and killed forty nine people in his 12 June 2016 attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida. Thirty eight people were killed within the club during his attack, eleven more died in hospitals to which they had been evacuated, and another fifty three were injured, many critically.[55][56]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Barbara, Stanton. G4S is the world's leading provider of security solutions. G4S – via DailyMotion.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "What is G4S and has it always been so controversial?". The Week UK. 13 July 2012. Retrieved 30 May 2016.
  3. 1 2 Alleyne, Richard (17 July 2012). "G4S previous controversies". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 30 May 2016.
  4. ↑ Failing private prisons to be renationalized says Labour, The Guardian, Nicholas Watt, Jan 2, 2014. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  5. 1 2 Booth, Robert; Hopkins, Nick (13 July 2012). "Olympic security chaos: depth of G4S security crisis revealed". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
  6. ↑ Gibson, Owen; Travis, Alan (12 July 2012). "Theresa May defends deploying 3,500 extra troops for Olympics security". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
  7. ↑ Nieuwhof, Adri (7 December 2012). "G4S equips the apartheid wall, Israel confirms". The Electronic Intifada. Retrieved 30 May 2016.
  8. ↑ Lazenby, Peter (27 May 2016). "Activists take on G4S for Israel delay". Morning Star. p. 5. Retrieved 30 May 2016.
  9. ↑ "Bimbo (see Grupo Bimbo)". business-humanrights.org. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
  10. ↑ Neate, Rupert (4 June 2014). "Desmond Tutu tells G4S to stop supplying to Israel prisons". theguardian.com. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  11. ↑ Tutu, Desmond; et al. (4 June 2014). "G4S must end its complicity in Israel's abuse of child prisoners". theguardian.com. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  12. ↑ "Desmond Tutu tells G4S to stop supplying to Israel prisons". The Guardian. 4 June 2014. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
  13. ↑ "Tell the UN to drop its contracts with Israeli Occupation prison contractor G4S". Addameer: Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association NGO. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  14. 1 2 Lazenby, Peter (11 March 2016). "G4S 'exits' toxic Israel targets". Morning Star. p. 2. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  15. ↑ "Union Reports Security Problems at Army Bases". USA Today. 6 September 2005.
  16. ↑ "Security Problems at Homeland Security Headquarters". Common Dreams. 7 March 2006.
  17. ↑ "Wackenhut Security Charged With Shortchanging Liberty Bell Security Officers". PR Newswire. 3 July 2007.
  18. ↑ "Illinois: Security at Nuclear Plants". New York Times. 15 December 2007.
  19. ↑ "Guard Allegedly Found Asleep at Oak Ridge Nuke Facility". Knoxville News Sentinel. 24 January 2012.
  20. 1 2 Quigley, Fran (15 May 2013). "How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists". CommonDreams.org. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  21. ↑ Another G4S nightmare: 82-year-old nun beats guards to break into nuclear facility The Independent, 4 August 2012
  22. ↑ Peter Stockton and Lydia Dennett (10 September 2012). "Cheating on Security Tests at Y-12 is Nothing New". PUBLISHER.
  23. ↑ "Nuke ops halted after protesters enter TN complex". Kansas City Star. 1 August 2012.
  24. ↑ G4S divest US Government Solutions Yahoo! Finance
  25. 1 2 Lewis, Paul; Matthew Taylor (18 October 2010). "Jimmy Mubenga death: three men arrested". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 19 October 2010.
  26. ↑ Lewis, Paul; Matthew Taylor (15 October 2010). "Deportation death: 'Jimmy Mubenga was a good man'". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 19 October 2010.
  27. ↑ Lewis, Paul; Taylor, Matthew (8 February 2011). "G4S Security was Warned of Lethal Risk to Refused Asylum Seekers". London: The Guardian.
  28. ↑ Wright, Oliver (6 September 2011). "Security Officers Accused of Racially Abusing Asylum Seekers". London: The Independent.
  29. ↑ "CPS decision on death of Jimmy Mubenga". 17 July 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
  30. ↑ Taylor, Matthew; Lewis, Paul (9 July 2013). "G4S faces damages claim over killing of Jimmy Mubenga". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  31. ↑ "Jimmy Mubenga: Deportee shouted 'you're killing me'". BBC News. 4 November 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  32. ↑ "Jimmy Mubenga trial: Jury put in handcuffs". BBC News. 17 November 2014. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
  33. 1 2 "G4S guards cleared over Jimmy Mubenga death". BBC News. 16 December 2014. Retrieved 16 December 2014.
  34. ↑ Clare Sambrook (17 December 2014). "The racist texts. What the Mubenga trial jury was not told". openDemocracy. Retrieved 6 September 2016.
  35. ↑ Jon Stone (6 September 2016). "Call for inquiry into why G4S was awarded Government contract for anti-discrimination hotline". Independent Newspapers. Retrieved 11 September 2016.
  36. ↑ "Cedars pre-departure accommodation – an exceptional facility". Ministry of Justice. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
  37. 1 2 3 "G4S used force on pregnant woman at Cedars centre". BBC News. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
  38. ↑ Siddle, John (25 September 2014). "Disabled ex-serviceman awarded £6,000 damages after being 'humiliated' by G4S prison officers". Liverpool Echo. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  39. ↑ "Tagging firm's 'overcharging' probed". BBC News. 11 July 2013. Retrieved 11 July 2013.
  40. ↑ "A review of major government contracts held with Serco and G4S". Cabinet Office. 19 December 2013. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  41. ↑ "G4S repays UK government £108.9m after tagging scandal". BBC News. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  42. 1 2 Forbes, Kate (28 October 2013). "'Shocking' abuse claims at South Africa's Mangaung prison". Website. BBC News. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
  43. ↑ Rawlinson, Kevin (22 August 2014). "Private firms 'are using detained immigrants as cheap labour'". theguardian.com. Retrieved 22 August 2014.
  44. ↑ "G4S-run youth jail criticised over degrading treatment of dainees". The Guardian.com. 20 May 2016. Retrieved 23 March 2016.
  45. ↑ Inspection of Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre (PDF). London: Ofsted. 20 May 2015. Retrieved 23 March 2016.
  46. ↑ "Four sacked after Panorama investigation into G4S unit". BBC News. 12 January 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  47. ↑ "Panorama G4S young offenders centre probe: Four arrested". BBC News. 13 January 2013. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  48. ↑ Hallison, Eric; Hattenstone, Simon (11 January 2016). "G4S guards at youth prison alleged to have falsified reports to avoid fines". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  49. ↑ Managers at G4S-run Medway youth jail paid bonuses despite failings, The Guardian, Eric Allison & Simon Hattenstone, October 21, 2016. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
  50. ↑ "G4S Medway unit: Security firm to sell children's services". BBC News. 26 February 2016. Retrieved 23 March 2016.
  51. 1 2 "Lincolnshire 999 call staff suspended over data manipulation claims". BBC News. Lincolnshire: BBC News Online. 23 May 2016. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
  52. 1 2 3 Travis, Alan (23 May 2016). "G4S police control room staff suspended over claims of bogus 999 calls". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
  53. ↑ Davenport, Christian (12 June 2016). "Orlando nightclub shooter worked at one of the world's largest security firms". Website. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
  54. ↑ "Deadliest U.S. mass shootings, 1984-2016". Website. Los Angeles Times. 12 June 2016. Retrieved 12 June 2016.
  55. ↑ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay; Pérez-Peña, Richard (June 14, 2016). "Orlando Shooting Survivors Cope With the Trauma of Good Fortune". The New York Times. Retrieved June 21, 2016. The slaughter early Sunday left 49 victims dead, in addition to the gunman, and 53 wounded ...More than 30 of the wounded remained in hospitals on Tuesday, including at least six who were in critical condition.
  56. ↑ "Orlando shooting victims arrived by 'truckloads,' doctor says". Chicago Tribune wire services. June 14, 2016. Retrieved June 21, 2016. The slaughter early Sunday left 49 victims dead, in addition to the gunman, and 53 wounded ...More than 30 of the wounded remained in hospitals on Tuesday, including at least six who were in critical condition.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Group 4 Securicor.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/22/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.