Gold cyanidation

Gold cyanidation (also known as the cyanide process or the MacArthur-Dingus process) is a metallurgical technique for extracting gold from low-grade ore by converting the gold to a water-soluble coordination complex. It is the most commonly used process for gold extraction.^[1] Production of reagents for mineral processing to recover gold, copper, zinc and silver represents approximately 13% of cyanide consumption globally, with the remaining 87% of cyanide used in other industrial processes such as plastics, adhesives, and pesticides.^[2] Due to the highly poisonous nature of cyanide, the process is controversial and its usage is banned in a number of countries and territories.

History

In 1783, Carl Wilhelm Scheele discovered that gold dissolved in aqueous solutions of cyanide. Through the work of Bagration (1844), Elsner (1846), and Faraday (1847), it was determined that each atom of gold required two cyanide ions, i.e. the stoichiometry of the soluble compound.

Industrial process

John Stewart MacArthur developed the cyanide process for gold extraction in 1887.

The expansion of gold mining in the Rand of South Africa began to slow down in the 1880s, as the new deposits being found tended to pyritic ore. The gold could not be extracted from this compound with any of the then available chemical processes or technologies.

In 1887, John Stewart MacArthur, working in collaboration with brothers Dr. Robert and Dr. William Dingus for the Tennant Company in Glasgow, Scotland, developed the MacArthur-Dingus process for the extraction of gold ores. By suspending the crushed ore in a cyanide solution, a separation of up to 96 percent pure gold was achieved.^[3]

The process was first used on the Rand in 1890 and, despite operational imperfections, led to a boom of investment as larger gold mines were opened up.^[4] By 1891, Nebraska pharmacist Gilbert S. Peyton had refined the process at his Mercur Mine in Utah, "the first mining plant in the United States to make a commercial success of the cyanide process on gold ores."^[5][6] In 1896, Bodländer confirmed that oxygen was necessary for the process, something that had been doubted by MacArthur, and discovered that hydrogen peroxide was formed as an intermediate.^[7]

Chemical reactions

Ball-and-stick model of the aurocyanide or dicyanoaurate(I) complex anion, [Au(CN)₂]⁻.^[8]

Cyanide leaching "heap" at a gold mining operation near Elko, Nevada

The chemical reaction for the dissolution of gold, the "Elsner Equation", follows:

4 Au + 8 NaCN + O₂ + 2H₂O → 4 Na[Au(CN)₂] + 4 NaOH

In this redox process, oxygen removes, via a two-step reaction, one electron from each gold atom to form the complex Au(CN)−
2 ion.^[9]

Application

The ore is comminuted using grinding machinery. Depending on the ore, it is sometimes further concentrated by froth flotation or by centrifugal (gravity) concentration. Water is added to produce a slurry or pulp. The basic ore slurry can be combined with a solution of sodium cyanide or potassium cyanide, however many operations utilize calcium cyanide, which is more cost effective.

To prevent the creation of toxic hydrogen cyanide during processing, slaked lime (calcium hydroxide) or soda (sodium hydroxide) is added to the extracting solution to ensure that the acidity during cyanidation is maintained over pH 10.5 - strongly basic. Lead nitrate can improve gold leaching speed and quantity recovered, particularly in processing partially oxidized ores.

Effect of dissolved oxygen

Oxygen is one of the reagents consumed during cyanidation, and a deficiency in dissolved oxygen slows leaching rate. Air or pure oxygen gas can be purged through the pulp to maximize the dissolved oxygen concentration. Intimate oxygen-pulp contactors are used to increase the partial pressure of the oxygen in contact with the solution, thus raising the dissolved oxygen concentration much higher than the saturation level at atmospheric pressure. Oxygen can also be added by dosing the pulp with hydrogen peroxide solution.

Pre-aeration and ore washing

In some ores, particularly those that are partially sulfidized, aeration (prior to the introduction of cyanide) of the ore in water at high pH can render elements such as iron and sulfur less reactive to cyanide, therefore making the gold cyanidation process more efficient. Specifically, the oxidation of iron to iron (III) oxide and subsequent precipitation as iron hydroxide minimizes loss of cyanide from the formation of ferrous cyanide complexes. The oxidation of sulfur compounds to sulfate ions avoids the consumption of cyanide to thiocyanate (SCN⁻) byproduct.

Recovery of gold from cyanide solutions

In order of decreasing economic efficiency, the common processes for recovery of the solubilized gold from solution are (certain processes may be precluded from use by technical factors):

• Carbon in pulp
• Electrowinning
• Merrill-Crowe process

Cyanide remediation processes

The various species of cyanide that remain in tails streams from gold plants are potentially toxic, and on some operations the waste streams are processed through a detoxification process prior to tails deposition. This reduces the concentrations of these cyanide compounds, but does not completely eliminate them from the stream. The two major processes utilised are the INCO-licensed process or the Caro's acid process. Both processes utilise oxidants to oxidise cyanide to cyanate, which is not as toxic as the cyanide ion, and which can then react to form carbonates and ammonia:

CN−
+ [O] → OCN−

OCN−
+ 2 H
2O → HCO−
3 + NH
3

The Inco process can typically reduce cyanide concentrations to below 50 mg/L, while the Caro's acid process can reduce cyanide levels to between 10 and 50 mg/L, with the lower concentrations achievable in solution streams rather than slurries. Hydrogen peroxide and basic chlorination can also be used, although these are typically less common.

One of the alternative oxidants for the degradation of cyanides that has been attracting industrial interest is Caro's acid – peroxomonosulphuric acid (H₂SO₅). Caro's acid converts cyanide to cyanate. Cyanate then hydrolyses in the water to ammonium and carbonate ions. The Caro's acid process is able to achieve discharge levels of WAD below 50 mg/L, which is generally suitable for discharge to tailings. Generally, the best application of this process is with tailings slurries containing low to moderate initial levels of cyanide and when treated cyanide levels of less than about 10 to 50 mg/L are required.

Over 90 mines worldwide now use an Inco SO₂/air detoxification circuit to convert cyanide to the much less toxic cyanate before waste is discharged to a tailings pond. Typically, this process blows compressed air through the tailings while adding sodium metabisulfite which releases SO₂, lime to maintain the pH at around 8.5, and copper sulfate as a catalyst if there is insufficient copper in the ore extract. This procedure can reduce concentrations of "Weak Acid Dissociable" (WAD) cyanide to below the 10 ppm mandated by the EU's Mining Waste Directive. This level compares to the 66-81 ppm free cyanide and 500-1000 ppm total cyanide in the pond at Baia Mare.^[10] Remaining free cyanide degrades in the pond, while cyanate ions hydrolyse to ammonium. Recent studies show that residual cyanide trapped in the gold-mine tailings causes persistent release of toxic metals (e.g. mercury ) into the groundwater and surface water systems.^[11][12]

Effects on the environment

Sodium cyanide drum at the abandoned Chemung Mine in Masonic, California

Despite being used in 90% of gold production,^[13] gold cyanidation is controversial due to the toxic nature of cyanide. Although aqueous solutions of cyanide degrade rapidly in sunlight, the less-toxic products, such as cyanates and thiocyanates, may persist for some years. The famous disasters have killed few people — humans can be warned not to drink or go near polluted water — but cyanide spills can have a devastating effect on rivers, sometimes killing everything for several miles downstream. However, the cyanide is soon washed out of river systems and, as long as organisms can migrate from unpolluted areas upstream, affected areas can soon be repopulated. According to Romanian authorities, in the Someș river below Baia Mare, the plankton returned to 60% of normal within 16 days of the spill, however the numbers were not confirmed by Hungary or Yugoslavia.^[10] Famous cyanide spills include  :

Such spills have prompted fierce protests at new mines that involve use of cyanide, such as Roşia Montană in Romania, Lake Cowal in Australia, Pascua Lama in Chile, and Bukit Koman in Malaysia.

Alternatives to cyanide

Although cyanide is cheap, effective, and biodegradable, its high toxicity has led to new methods for extracting gold using less toxic reagents. Other extractants have been examined including thiosulfate (S₂O₃²⁻), thiourea (SC(NH₂)₂), iodine/iodide, ammonia, liquid mercury and alpha-cyclodextrin. Challenges include reagent cost and the efficiency of gold recovery. Thiourea has been implemented commercially for ores containing stibnite.^[15]

Legislation

The US states of Montana^[16] and Wisconsin,^[17] the Czech Republic,^[18] Hungary,^[19] and other countries have banned cyanide mining. However, the European Commission rejected a proposal for such a ban, noting that existing regulations (see below) provide adequate environmental and health protection.^[20] Several attempts to ban gold cyanidation in Romania were rejected by the Romaniana Parliament. There are currently protests in Romania calling for a ban on the use of cyanide in mining (see 2013 Romanian protests against the Roșia Montană Project).

In the EU, industrial use of hazardous chemicals is controlled by the so-called Seveso II Directive (Directive 96/82/EC,^[21] which replaced the original Seveso Directive (82/501/EEC^[22] brought in after the 1976 dioxin disaster. "Free cyanide and any compound capable of releasing free cyanide in solution" are further controlled by being on List I of the Groundwater Directive (Directive 80/68/EEC)^[23] which bans any discharge of a size which might cause deterioration in the quality of the groundwater at the time or in the future. The Groundwater Directive was largely replaced in 2000 by the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).^[24]

In response to the 2000 Baia Mare cyanide spill, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 2006/21/EC on the management of waste from extractive industries.^[25] Article 13(6) requires "the concentration of weak acid dissociable cyanide in the pond is reduced to the lowest possible level using best available techniques", and at most all mines started after 1 May 2008 may not discharge waste containing over 10ppm WAD cyanide, mines built or permitted before that date are allowed no more than 50ppm initially, dropping to 25ppm in 2013 and 10ppm by 2018.

Under Article 14, companies must also put in place financial guarantees to ensure clean-up after the mine has finished. This in particular may affect smaller companies wanting to build gold mines in the EU, as they are less likely to have the financial strength to give these kinds of guarantees.

The industry has come up with a voluntary "Cyanide Code"^[26] that aims to reduce environmental impacts with third party audits of a company's cyanide management.

References

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Gold mining.

• Efforts at a cleaner process
• Yestech A different commercial method that does not use toxic cyanide
• Cyanide Uncertainties (PDF)