Fox v. Vice
Fox v. Vice | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued March 22, 2011 Decided June 6, 2011 | |||||||
Full case name | Ricky D. Fox, Petitioner v. Judy Ann Vice, as Executrix of the Estate of Billy Ray Vice, et al. | ||||||
Docket nos. | 10-114 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Argument | Oral argument | ||||||
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
Reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims.[1]
Notes
See also
References
- Supreme Court of the United States (June 2011). "Fox v. Vice (Syllabus)".
- Supreme Court of the United States (June 2011). "Fox v. Vice (Opinion)".
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.