Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 14, 1991 Decided May 13, 1991 | |||||||
Full case name | Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. | ||||||
Docket nos. | 90-18 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Prior history | 895 F.2d 195 | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
Petitioner's statutory claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act are subject to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act pursuant to the parties' agreement. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | White, joined by Rehnquist, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter | ||||||
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Marshall | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
Federal Arbitration Act |
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991), is a 1991 case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of an arbitration clause to compel arbitration of statutory Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims. A regional brokerage house, Interstate Johnson Lane later became part of Wachovia Securities.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.