Snow science

See also: Snow
Snow pit on the surface of a glacier, profiling snow properties, which become increasingly dense as it metamorphoses towards ice.

Snow science addresses how snow forms, its distribution, and processes affecting how snowpacks change over time. Scientists improve storm forecasting, study global snow cover and its effect on climate, glaciers, and water supplies around the world. The study includes physical properties of the material as it changes, bulk properties of in-place snow packs, and the aggregate properties of regions with snow cover. In doing so, they employ on-the-ground physical measurement techniques to establish ground truth and remote sensing techniques to develop understanding of snow-related processes over large areas.[1]

History

An early classification of snowflakes by Israel Perkins Warren.[2]

Snow was described in China, as early as 135 BCE in Han Ying's book "Disconnection, which contrasted the pentagonal symmetry of flowers with the hexagonal symmetry of snow.[3] Albertus Magnus proved what may be the earliest detailed European description of snow in 1250. Johannes Kepler attempted to explain why snow crystals are hexagonal in his 1611 book, Strenaseu De Nive Sexangula.[4] In 1675 Friedrich Martens, a German physician, catalogued 24 types of snow crystal. In 1865, Frances E. Chickering published Cloud Crystals - a Snow-Flake Album.[5][6] In 1894, A. A. Sigson photographed snowflakes under a microscope, preceding Wilson Bentley's series of photographs of individual snowflakes in the Monthly Weather Review.

From 1936 to 1949, Ukichiro Nakaya created artificial snow crystals and charted the relationship between temperature and water vapor saturation, later called the Nakaya Diagram and other works of research in snow, which were published in 1954 by Harvard University Press publishes as Snow Crystals: Natural and Artificial. Teisaku Kobayashi, verified and improves the Nakaya Diagram with the 1960 Kobayashi Diagram, later refined in 1962.[7][8]

Further interest in artificial snowflake genesis continued in 1979 with Toshio Kurod and Rolf Lacmann, of the Braunschweig University of Technology, publishing Growth Mechanism of Ice from Vapour Phase and its Growth Forms. In August 1983, Astronauts synthesized snow crystals in orbit on the Space Shuttle Challenger during mission STS-8.[9] By 1988 Norihiko Fukuta et al. confirmed the Nakaya Diagram with artificial snow crystals, made in an updraft[10][11][12] and Yoshinori Furukawa demonstrated snow crystal growth in space.[13]

Measurement

Snow scientists typically excavate a snow pit within which to make basic measurements and observations. Observations can describe features caused by wind, water percolation, or snow unloading from trees.Water percolation into a snowpack can create flow fingers and ponding or flow along capillary barriers, which can refreeze into horizontal and vertical solid ice formations within the snowpack. Among the measurements of the properties of snowpacks (together with their codes) that the International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground presents are:[14]

Instruments

An ultrasonic snow depth sensor

Depth – Depth of snow is measured with a snowboard (typically a piece of plywood painted white) observed during a six-hour period. At the end of the six-hour period, all snow is cleared from the measuring surface. For a daily total snowfall, four six-hour snowfall measurements are summed. Snowfall can be very difficult to measure due to melting, compacting, blowing and drifting.[15]

Liquid equivalent by snow gauge – The liquid equivalent of snowfall may be evaluated using a snow gauge[16] or with a standard rain gauge having a diameter of 100 mm (4 in; plastic) or 200 mm (8 in; metal).[17] Rain gauges are adjusted to winter by removing the funnel and inner cylinder and allowing the snow/freezing rain to collect inside the outer cylinder. Antifreeze liquid may be added to melt the snow or ice that falls into the gauge.[18] In both types of gauges once the snowfall/ice is finished accumulating, or as its height in the gauge approaches 300 mm (12 in), the snow is melted and the water amount recorded.[19]

Classification

The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground has a more extensive classification of deposited snow than those that pertain to airborne snow. A list of the main categories (quoted together with their codes) comprises:[14]

Precipitation particles

The classification of frozen particulates extends the prior classifications of Nakaya and his successors and are quoted in the following table:[14]

Precipitation particles
Subclass Shape Physical process
Columns Prismatic crystal, solid or hollow Growth from water vapour

at –8 °C and below–30 °C

Needles Needle-like, approximately cylindrical Growth from water vapour

at super-saturation at –3 to –5 °C below –60 °C

Plates Plate-like, mostly hexagonal Growth from water vapour

at 0 to –3 °C and –8 to –70 °C

Stellars, Dendrites Six-fold star-like, planar or spatial Growth from water vapour

at supersaturation at 0 to –3 °C and at –12 to –16 °C

Irregular crystals Clusters of very small crystals Polycrystals growing in varying

environmental conditions

Graupel Heavily rimed particles, spherical, conical,

hexagonal or irregular in shape

Heavy riming of particles by

accretion of supercooled water droplets

Hail Laminar internal structure, translucent

or milky glazed surface

Growth by accretion of

supercooled water, size: >5 mm

Ice pellets Transparent,

mostly small spheroids

Freezing of raindrops or refreezing of largely melted snow crystals or snowflakes (sleet).

Graupel or snow pellets encased in thin ice layer (small hail). Size: both 5 mm

Rime Irregular deposits or longer cones and

needles pointing into the wind

Accretion of small, supercooled fog droplets frozen in place.

Thin breakable crust forms on snow surface if process continues long enough.

All are formed in cloud, except for rime, which forms on objects exposed to supercooled moisture, and some plate, dendrites and stellars, which can form in a temperature inversion under clear sky.

Physical properties

Each such layer of a snowpack differs from the adjacent layers by one or more characteristics that describe its microstructure or density, which together define the snow type, and other physical properties. Thus, at any one time, the type and state of the snow forming a layer have to be defined because its physical and mechanical properties depend on them. The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground lays out the following measurements of snow properties (together with their codes):[14]

Satellite data and analysis

Remote sensing of snowpacks with satellites and other platforms typically includes multi-spectral collection of imagery. Sophisticated interpretation of the data obtained allows inferences about what is observed. The science behind these remote observations has been verified with ground-truth studies of the actual conditions.[20]

Satellite observations record a decrease in snow-covered areas since the 1960s, when satellites when satellite observations began. In some areas, including China, snow cover has increased. In some regions such as China, a trend of increasing snow cover has been observed (from 1978 to 2006. These changes are attributed to global climate change, which may lead to earlier melting and less aea coverage. However, in some areas there may be an increase in snow depth because of higher temperatures for latitudes north of 40°. For the Northern Hemisphere as a whole the mean monthly snow-cover extent has been decreasing by 1.3% per decade.[21]

Satellite observation of snow relies on the usefulness of the physical and spectral properties of snow for analysing remotely sensed data. Dietz, et al. summarize this, as follows:[21]

The most frequently used methods to map and measure snow extent, snow depth and snow water equivalent employ multiple inputs on the visible–infrared spectrum to deduce the presence and properties of snow. The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) uses the reflectance of visible and infrared radiation to calculate a normalized difference snow index, which is a ratio of radiation parameters that can distinguish between clouds and snow. Other researchers have developed decision trees, employing the available data to make more accurate assessments. One challenge to this assessment is where snow cover is patchy, for example during periods of accumulation or ablation and also in forested areas. Cloud cover inhibits optical sensing of surface reflectance, which has led to other methods for estimating ground conditions underneath clouds. For hydrological models, it is important to have continuous information about the snow cover. Applicable techniques involve interpolation, using the known to infer the unknown. Passive microwaves sensors are especially valuable for temporal and spatial continuity because they can map the surface beneath clouds and in darkness. When combined with reflective measurements, passive microwave sensing greatly extends the inferences possible about the snowpack.[21]

Models

Snowfall and snowmelt are parts of the Earth's water cycle.

Snow science often leads to predictive models that include snow deposition, snow melt, and snow hydrology—elements of the Earth's water cycle—which help describe global climate change.[20]

Global climate change

Global climate change models (GCMs) incorporate snow as a factor in their calculations. Some important aspects of snow cover include its albedo (reflectivity of light) and insulating qualities, which slow the rate of seasonal melting of sea ice. As of 2011, the melt phase of GCM snow models were thought to perform poorly in regions with complex factors that regulate snowmelt, such as vegetation cover and terrain. These models compute snow water equivalent (SWE) in some manner, such as:[20]

SWE = [ –ln( 1 – fc )] / D

where:

Snowmelt

Given the importance of snowmelt to agriculture, hydrological runoff models that include snow in their predictions address the phases of accumulating snowpack, melting processes, and distribution of the meltwater through stream networks and into the groundwater. Key to describing the melting processes are solar heat flux, ambient temperature, wind, and precipitation. Initial snowmelt models used a degree-day approach that emphasized the temperature difference between the air and the snowpack to compute snow water equivalent (SWE) as:[20]

SWE = M (TaTm) when TaTm

= 0 when Ta < Tm

where:

More recent models use an energy balance approach that take into account the following factors to compute the energy available for melt (Qm) as:[20]

Qm = Q* +Qh + Qe + Qg + QrQΘ

where:

Calculation of the various heat flow quantities (Q ) requires measurement of a much greater range of snow and environmental factors than just temperatures.[20]

References

  1. Editors (2016). "All About Snow—Snow Science". National Snow and Ice Data Center. University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved 2016-11-30.
  2. Warren, Israel Perkins (1863). Snowflakes: a chapter from the book of nature. Boston: American Tract Society. p. 164. Retrieved 2016-11-25.
  3. "The History of the Science of snowflakes" (PDF). Dartmouth College. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  4. Kepler, Johannes (1966) [1611]. De nive sexangula [The Six-sided Snowflake]. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OCLC 974730.
  5. "36. CHICKERING, Mrs. Francis E., Dorothy Sloan Books – Bulletin 9 (12/92)" (PDF). December 1992. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1992-12-01. Retrieved 2009-10-20.
  6. Cloud Crystals - a Snow-Flake Album, Author: Chickering, Frances E., Year: 1865
  7. 油川英明 (Hideaki Aburakawa). 2.雪は「天からの手紙」か? [2. Is snow "The letter from the sky"?] (PDF) (in Japanese). The Meteorological Society of Japan, Hokkaido Branch. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-07-18. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  8. Hideomi Nakamura (中村秀臣) and Osamu Abe (阿部修). "Density of the Daily New Snow Observed in Shinjō, Yamagata" (PDF) (in Japanese). National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention(NIED). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-07-18. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  9. 第8話「25年前に宇宙実験室で人工雪作り」 [Story No.8 Artificial snow in experimental chamber 25 years ago] (in Japanese). Hiratsuka, Kanagawa: KELK. Archived from the original on 2009-10-23. Retrieved 2009-10-23.
  10. 樋口敬二 (Keizou Higuchi). 花島政人先生を偲んで [Think of the dead, Professor Masato Hanashima] (PDF) (in Japanese). Kaga, Ishikawa. p. 12. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  11. "Murai式人工雪発生装置による雪結晶" [Lit. Snow Crystals by Murai-method Artificial Snow Crystal producer] (in Japanese). Retrieved 2010-07-26.
  12. Japanese Utility model No.3106836
  13. "Crystal growth in space" (in Japanese). JAXA. Archived from the original on 2009-07-22.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Fierz, C.; Armstrong, R.L.; Durand, Y.; Etchevers, P.; Greene, E.; et al. (2009), The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground (PDF), IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology, 83, Paris: UNESCO, p. 80, retrieved 2016-11-25
  15. National Weather Service Forecast Office Northern Indiana (October 2004). "Snow Measurement Guidelines for National Weather Service Snow Spotters" (PDF). National Weather ServiceCentral Region Headquarters.
  16. "Nipher Snow Gauge". On.ec.gc.ca. 2007-08-27. Retrieved 2011-08-16.
  17. National Weather Service Office, Northern Indiana (2009-04-13). "8 Inch Non-Recording Standard Rain Gage". National Weather Service Central Region Headquarters. Retrieved 2009-01-02.
  18. Chris Lehmann (2009). "Central Analytical Laboratory". National Atmospheric Deposition Program. Retrieved 2009-07-07.
  19. National Weather Service Office Binghamton, New York (2009). Raingauge Information. Retrieved on 2009-01-02.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael P. Bishop, Helgi Björnsson, Wilfried Haeberli, Johannes Oerlemans, John F. Shroder, Martyn Tranter (2011), Singh, Vijay P.; Singh, Pratap; Haritashya, Umesh K., eds., Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers, Springer Science & Business Media, p. 1253, ISBN 9789048126415, retrieved 2016-11-25
  21. 1 2 3 Dietz, A.; Kuenzer, C.; Gessner, U.; Dech, S. (2012). "Remote Sensing of Snow – a Review of available methods". International Journal of Remote Sensing. 33: 4094–4134. Bibcode:2012IJRS...33.4094D. doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.640964.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.