The Concept of the Political
.jpg) Cover of the German edition | |
| Author | Carl Schmitt |
|---|---|
| Translator | George Schwab |
| Country | Germany |
| Language | German |
| Subject | Political philosophy |
| Publisher | Rutgers University Press |
Publication date | 1932 |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 105 |
| ISBN | 0-226-73886-8 (1996 University of Chicago Press edition) |
| LC Class | JA 74 .S313 |
The Concept of the Political (German: Der Begriff des Politischen) is a 1932 work by the German philosopher and jurist Carl Schmitt. In it, Schmitt examines the fundamental nature of the "political" and its place in the modern world.
Summary
Schmitt attacks the "liberal-neutralist" and "utopian" notions that politics can be removed of all warlike, agonistic energy, arguing conflict existed as embedded in existence itself, likewise constituting an ineradicable trait of anthropological human nature. Schmitt attempts to substantiate his ideas by referencing the declared anthropological pessimism of "realistic" Catholic (and Christian) theology. The anti-perfectibilist pessimism of Traditional Catholic theology Schmitt considers esoterically relevant to the inner ontological being of politics and political activity in the contemporary world, modern people subconsciously secularizing theological intellectual ideas and concerns. Schmitt criticizes political "radicals" as basically ignorant, deluded, pseudo-messianic in mentality, and oblivious to the stark, hard knowledge of unveiled human nature, its esse, encoded in ancient theology, wherein Original Sin held central, axial place, intertwining his own ideas of meta-politics with a reformulated "metaphysics of evil".[1]
Publication history
The Concept of the Political was first published in 1932 by Duncker & Humblot (Munich). It was an elaboration of a journal article of the same title, published in 1927 (Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, vol.58, no.1, pp.1-33).[2] This later version has significant, and controversial, revisions. However, it is likely that these revisions were made in response to the reaction of Leo Strauss.[1]