United States v. La Vengeance
United States v. La Vengeance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued August 10, 1796 Decided August 11, 1796 | |||||||
Full case name | United States v. La Vengeance | ||||||
Citations |
1 L. Ed. 610; 1796 U.S. LEXIS 402; 3 Dall. 297 | ||||||
Prior history | Error from the Circuit Court for the District of New York | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
A proceeding by the United States to forfeit a vessel is a cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and courts will take judicial notice of a geographical fact. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Elsworth, joined by unanimous |
United States v. La Vengeance, 3 U.S. 297 (1796), was an 1796 decision of the United States Supreme Court which found that a proceeding by the United States to forfeit a vessel is a cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Specifically, "[a]n injunction to enforce the forfeiture of a vessel, for an illegal exportation of arms and ammunition, is a civil cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. The courts will take judicial notice of a geographical fact."[1]
References
- ↑ Reports of cases ruled and adjudged in the several courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania: held at the seat of the federal government, Volume 3 (Banks Law Pub. Co., 1905) pg. 297
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.