Edward Troup

Not to be confused with the late 19th and early 20th century civil servant at the Home Office, Sir (Charles) Edward Troup KCB KCVO (1857-1941)

Edward Troup
Born	John Edward Astley Troup (1955-01-26) 26 January 1955
Education	Oundle School
Alma mater	Corpus Christi College, Oxford
Occupation	executive chair, HM Revenue and Customs
Spouse(s)	Siriol Jane Martin (m. 1978)
Children	4

John Edward Astley Troup (born 26 January 1955) is a British tax lawyer, and a civil servant at HM Treasury and then HM Revenue & Customs. He spent two periods as a tax partner at the law firm Simmons & Simmons, from 1985 to 1995 and from 1997 to 2004, and was a special adviser to Kenneth Clarke as Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1995-97.

He rejoined HM Treasury in 2004, and became Executive Chair and First Permanent Secretary of the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in April 2016.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

Early and private life

Troup is the son of Vice-Admiral Sir Anthony Troup KCB DSC* (1921-2008) and his second wife Cordelia Mary Troup (née Hope) (died 2009). His father was the youngest British naval officer to command a submarine in the Second World War, aged 21 in June 1943, and he was later the last Commander-in-Chief, Far East Fleet. Before his retirement, Anthony Troup was Flag Officer Submarines and then Flag Officer Scotland and Northern Ireland.^[6]

Troup was educated at Oundle School until 1972, and then studied mathematics at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, graduating with a BA in 1976 and an MSc in 1977.^[7]

He married Siriol Jane Martin in 1978. They have four children.^[6]

Legal career

He joined Simmons & Simmons in 1979, qualifying as a solicitor in 1981, and became an Associate of the Chartered Institute of Taxation in 1983. He became a Freeman at the Worshipful Company of Grocers in 1980. According to The Guardian in April 2016, "Troup ... built a career advising corporations on how to reduce their tax bills".^[5]

From 1985 to 1995, Troup was a tax partner at Simmons & Simmons. He joined the Treasury as a special adviser to Chancellor of the Exchequer Kenneth Clarke and returned to Simmons & Simmons as its head of tax strategy after the 1997 general election.^[8] Shortly afterwards, Troup wrote a series of Personal View commentaries for the Financial Times, including one titled "Double trouble over tax"^[9] on the problems caused because the UK has two separate tax authorities, the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise, and the advantages of merging them. Another piece, Right result, wrong reasons, considering the reasons to abolishing tax credits on dividends.^[10] Why the chancellor is missing the point, on the flaws in the tax system and the importance of the rule of law in taxation, in which he expressed the opinion that "tax avoidance is not a moral issue" and described tax itself as "legalised extortion".^[11] Troup's article 15 July 1997 was criticized by Richard Murphy of the Tax Justice Network in 2013.^[12][13]

Tax avoidance is not a moral issue but the result of the flawed nature of the tax system ...

... behind the easy macho rhetoric of being tough on tax avoidance, successive chancellors have consistently failed to understand the inevitable nature of avoidance as a reaction to complexity ... Tax avoidance is a normal market reaction ... businesses will make a risk/return evaluation ... This judgment not immoral, it is inevitable in a market economy. The aim of government should not be to adopt a high moral tone but to do the best to ensure that the "return" from tax planning is as low as possible ...
... A simpler tax system, with fewer reliefs, exemptions and discontinuities would, in the long term, frustrate most of the tax avoiders' ploys.
...
Faith in a general anti-avoidance provision is based on a lack of understanding of the real nature of tax avoidance. The popular idea is too often confused with the claim that "tax avoiders are paying less tax than they should", even though is no objective way of determining how much they "should" be paying. Tax law does not codify some Platonic set of tax-raising principles. Taxation is legalised extortion and is valid only to the extent of the law.
Tax avoidance is not paying less tax than you "should". Tax avoidance is paying less tax than Parliament would have wanted. ...
Too often at this point in the analysis the dangerous chimera of the general anti-avoidance provision hoves into view. ... It is merely a pious statement that parliamentary intention should not be frustrated ... It would, of necessity, have to give the tax authorities the discretion to invoke, or not to invoke, its operation. The taxpayer would be laid at the mercy of the bureaucrat. ...
The issue of tax avoidance is real and important, but it cannot be considered in isolation from wider questions of the structure and direction of the tax system as a whole.

— "Why the chancellor is missing the point", Personal view: Edward Troup, Financial Times, 15 July 1997.^[11]

Appearing before the Treasury Select Committee on the subject of tax havens in 1999, as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development began to take measures with regards to offshore companies,^[4] Troup immediately had to declare an interest with regards to the Code of Conduct, saying: "In relation to the offshore jurisdictions, [I am involved with] assisting them [and] putting their representations to the OECD".^[14] Asked if tax havens "mobilise capital which would not otherwise get itself mobilised and so increase international economic activity", Troup replied that "If it did not assist people would not pay for the use of those jurisdictions and those centres. My intuitive response must be yes, it does assist tremendously... It is difficult to see the world without many of these jurisdictions",^[15] adding "it is very difficult for UK residents or companies actually to reduce their tax bill legitimately through any offshore means".^[16]

Troup advised on the management buyout of part of hedge fund Man Group in 2000, commenting that "achieving a tax-efficient structure in the context of a buyout involving businesses and shareholders round the world posed some interesting challenges".^[17] The new business owners of the company ended up holding their shares through a trust company in Jersey.^[4]

Documents included in the Panama Papers leak demonstrated that Simmons & Simmons dealt with the Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca,^[18] at the centre of an international scandal on tax havens, tax avoidance and corruption^[19]). Papers obtained by the Süddeutsche Zeitung and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists also reveal Simmons & Simmons' close relationship with running offshore companies and major overseas property owners, including an investment company run on behalf of Sheikh Hamad bin Abdullah Al Thani, while Troup was a tax partner.^[20]

Civil servant

Troup returned to HM Treasury in 2004 as Director of Business and Indirect Tax, and became Director General of Tax and Welfare at HM Treasury in 2010.^[21] In March 2016, Private Eye characterized Troup's time in the Treasury as including a series of relaxations to laws regarding multinational corporations and alleged tax havens.^[4]

He succeeded David Hartnett as the Tax Assurance Commissioner and Second Permanent Secretary at HMRC in September 2012.^[22][23] The last months of Hartnett's career were tainted with allegations of "sweetheart deals" involving Vodafone and Goldman Sachs.^[4][24] Troup was appointed as Executive Chair and First Permanent Secretary at HMRC from April 2016.^[25][26]

References