Illusory truth effect
The illusory truth effect (also known as the truth effect or the illusion-of-truth effect) is the tendency to believe information to be correct after repeated exposure. This phenomenon was first discovered in 1977 at Villanova University and Temple University.[1]
History
The effect was first named and defined following the results in a study from 1977.[1] Participants in it were given a list of 60 factoids which were plausible, but they most likely did not know. It consisted of statements like "The first air force base was launched in New Mexico.", "Large migration of Chinese railroad workers began in the 1880s." or "Basketball became an Olympic discipline in 1925." They had to grade their belief that a statement was true on a scale from one to seven.
This was repeated in three occasions with two weeks between each. Twenty of the statements (one third) remained throughout all occasions. The rest of the statements were new. Respondents graded for the repeated statements higher in later sessions: 4.2 in the first session, 4.6 in the second session and 4.7 in the last session. However, the grading for the rest of the statements showed no discernible pattern.[1]
Experimental evidence
An experiment conducted by Lisa Fazio of Vanderbilt University illustrated the illusory truth effect.[2] A group of undergraduate students were asked to read through a list of sentences, some of which were blatantly true, some of which were blatantly false, and others which were more complicated. For example: "North America is a continent." (True.) "A clementine is a fully grown orange." (False.) "Sydney is the capital of Australia." (False, but maybe not so obvious, depending on one’s knowledge of world capitals.) After, students were given another set of statements, but they were asked to rank each statement on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 meaning definitely false and 6 meaning definitely true. Finally, the participants answered multiple-choice questions that corresponded to the previous statements they had just read.[3]
Results from this study revealed that the ease with which people comprehend statements, also known as processing fluency, underlies the illusory truth effect. The use of repetition makes statements easier to process, compared to new statements, which leads people to the false conclusion that the repeated statements are more truthful.[3]
Pop culture
Many different cultural items have been used through history to propagate false truths and lead to the illusory truth effect. Repeated exposure to ideas about something in sources of mass media will reinforce its truth. The main outlets that influence the illusory truth effect are films, novels, images, advertisements, and social media.[4]
Politics
The illusory truth effect has a visible impact in the political sphere. By appealing to unconscious biases and beliefs, politicians are able to form believable claims, regardless of actual validity. Through repeated exposure, the claims become increasingly believed as the illusory truth effect dictates.[3]
See also
- Argumentum ad nauseam
- False belief
- False memory
- Fluency heuristic and processing fluency
- Implicit and explicit memory
- List of cognitive biases
- Memory error
- Mere-exposure effect
- Misconception
- Source-monitoring error
- Truthiness
References
- 1 2 3 Hasher, Lynn; Goldstein, David; Toppino, Thomas (1977). "Frequency and the conference of referential validity" (PDF). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 16 (1): 107–112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1.
- ↑ Fazio, Lisa K.; Brashier, Nadia M.; Payne, B. Keith; Marsh, Elizabeth J. (2015). "Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 144 (5): 993–1002. doi:10.1037/xge0000098.
- 1 2 3 "Even People Who Know Better Fall for Lies If They Hear Them Enough". Science of Us. Retrieved 2016-04-22.
- ↑ "The Illusion of Truth - PsyBlog". PsyBlog. Retrieved 2016-04-22.
Further reading
- Gigerenzer, Gerd (1984). "External Validity of Laboratory Experiments: The Frequency-Validity Relationship". The American Journal of Psychology. 97 (2): 185–195. doi:10.2307/1422594. JSTOR 1422594.
- Zacks, Rose T.; Hasher, Lynn (2002). "Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective" (PDF). In Sedlmeier, Peter; Betsch, Tilmann. Etc. Frequency Processing and Cognition. pp. 21–36. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508632.003.0002. ISBN 9780198508632.