The Man Versus the State

The Man Versus the State is a political theory book by Herbert Spencer^[1]

It was first published in book form in 1884 by Williams and Norgate, London and Edinburgh, from articles previous published in The Contemporary Review.^[2] The book consists of four main chapters : The New Toryism, The coming Slavery, The sins of legislators and The Great Political Superstition. In this book, English libertarian sociologist Herbert Spencer sees a statist corruption appearing within the liberal ideological framework, and warns of what he calls, "the coming slavery". And he presents the argument that liberalism, which liberated the world from slavery and feudalism, was undergoing a transformation. Its new love for the state would put liberalism behind a movement to create a new despotism that would be worse than the old. Henry Hazlitt has once said that this is "One of the most powerful and influential arguments for limited government, laissez faire and individualism ever written.".^[3]

"The function of Liberalism in the past was that of putting a limit to the powers of kings. The function of true Liberalism in the future will be that of putting a limit to the power of Parliaments."

— Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State

The New Toryism

In the first chapter of the book, Herbert Spencer starts by saying, that those of which who now pass as Liberals, actually act as Tories of a new type, and proceeds by arguing that the so-called liberals, who once fought for liberalization, liberties and limiting the power of the nobility, have now obtained interest in increasing the power of the parliament and the government instead of giving liberties to the people; the liberals have changed their ways completely and adopted measures of increasing their importance in the lives of men just as the Tories did, by keeping power into their own hands. In his own words :

"And now comes the inquiry—How is it that Liberals have lost sight of this? How is it that Liberalism, getting more and more into power, has grown more and more coercive in its legislation? How is it that, either directly through its own majorities or indirectly through aid given in such cases to the majorities of its opponents, Liberalism has to an increasing extent adopted the policy of dictating the actions of citizens, and, by consequence, diminishing the range throughout which their actions remain free? How are we to explain this spreading confusion of thought which has led it, in pursuit of what appears to be public good, to invert the method by which in earlier days it achieved public good?"

— Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State; The New Toryism

Spencer argues that these new "Liberals" simply exchanged the power of the kings to the parliament.^[4]

The Coming Slavery

In his second chapter, Spencer focus on the poor social class, reporting certain areas in London, and blaming the existence of poverty in these classes, and in a crude manner, its problems to the society as a whole, on the certain systems of that society in which the hard work of the young are not rewarded and tend to incline to criminality: such as the religious ones, in which, he argues, waste time reporting things which do not relate to the truth.

"The belief, not only of the socialists but also of those so-called Liberals who are diligently preparing the way for them, is that by due skill an ill-working humanity may be framed into well-working institutions. It is a delusion. The defective natures of citizens will show themselves in the bad acting of whatever social structure they are arranged into. There is no political alchemy by which you can get golden conduct out of leaden instincts."

— Herbert Spencer, The Man Versus the State; The Coming Slavery

^[5]

References

External links

• http://www.econlib.org/library/LFBooks/Spencer/spnMvS0.html
• https://mises.org/library/man-versus-state
• https://mises.org/library/spencers-1884-orwells-1984
• http://www.econlib.org/library/LFBooks/Spencer/spnMvS1.html#The New Toryism